Skip to main content

Compare Spark engines

Compare pricing models, deployment options, and engine capabilities across Quanton, Databricks Photon, OSS Spark, Apache DataFusion Comet, and Apache Gluten.

For rates and a workload cost estimate, use the pricing calculator. For benchmark setup and reproduction steps, see Benchmarking.

Feature comparison​

Scroll horizontally to compare all six options.

CapabilityQuantonDatabricks ClassicDatabricks ServerlessOSS SparkApache DataFusion CometApache Gluten
Pricing modelPer-GiB processedDBU × compute hoursDBU × compute hours, EC2 bundledFree engine, pay for EC2 hoursFree engineFree engine
Runs in your VPCYesYes (BYOC)No — Databricks-hostedYesYesYes
EC2 discounts (RI/spot) stay yoursYesYesNoYesYesYes
Vectorized executionOptimized and reimplemented Velox operatorsPhoton (closed)Photon (closed)NoOSS DataFusion operatorsVanilla OSS Velox
Storage-aware planningIceberg + Hudi metadataDelta-focusedDelta-focusedNoNoNo
Scan speedupYes — optimized I/O, lower scheduling overheadYesYesNoNoNo
Index-aware joinsYes — new relational operator that cuts join costNoNoNoNoNo
Query plan optimizationAdvanced plan reshapingYesYesLimitedLimitedLimited
Native columnar MERGE / compactionYes (~4× faster)Delta onlyDelta onlyNoNoNo
Dynamic accelerationYes — dynamic index maintenanceNoNoNoNoNo
Memory-pressure resiliencyOptimized memory allocator, smart spillingYesYesSpark defaultOOMs on q67/q93OOMs on q67/q93
AI Spark engineer in Spark UIYes — free, works across all enginesLimitedLimitedNoNoNo
Reversible — point back to OSS SparkOne config lineLocked in by Databricks SQL extensionsLocked in by Databricks SQL extensionsN/AYesYes

The Comet and Gluten memory-pressure results refer to q67 and q93 in the TPC-DS 10 TB benchmark. The compaction speedup is a separate workload result from the overall Spark execution speedup.